D
Deleted member 46223
Guest
A few pictures of my Uranium element cube. First by itself, second was under a 365nm LED light, third was with my 395nm LED light, and the last was with a ~15mW 488nm laser.




Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very cool. Nice little piece of uranium. Have you tested it on a Geiger counter?
I recently picked up a piece of art deco uranium glass at a vintage fair. I had a modern uranium pebble already but uranium glass from that era has a higher content.
It’s being gifted to me for Xmas though so can’t photograph it until after then.
Because I collect crystals as well I’m looking into building a small display shelf that has inbuilt 385nm led strip lighting. However do you notice a strong difference using 365nm?They cost 3x as much to buy though. I have a 10w 385nm led and it does a good job. So is it worth investing in 20nm less or stick with the 385nm strips?
Nice torches. It could be the resin. Most resins however glow blue/green under uv absorption. 365nm will also eradicate the visible scattering left over in the torch emission too. I wonder if its a bit of both?I don't have a Geiger counter unfortunately. It could be because whatever material the cube is made of blocks some of the 365nm light, but I find the cube fluoresces better under the 395nm than the 365nm. I can't be 100% sure that the wavelength ratings are correct, but the 395 does looks much more violet and is much more visible in person, while the 365 is much dimmer and is a very pale ghostly violet. (Unfortunately, my camera doesn't pick this up exactly as it appears in person.)
These were the UV lights I used, just randomly found them in a local hardware store and had to buy them.
![]()
Closest I could get to how I saw it with my camera: 395 on the left, 365 on the right.
![]()