Hi Guys,
I get a sense that maybe there´s a perception that I´m somehow not giving LaserGlow their due. This is not true at all. I still stand by my original comment, the essence of which is that any firm that wants to thrive, particularly in the Internet Age, ought to replace a product that´s not up to spec. Any smart firm knows that it´s good business sense to ship a product that works according to their advertising. I grant you that not all firms are smart, and some may screw their customers for short-term hit and run gains. But those won´t thrive, and this is why companies like LaserGlow, AtlasNova, and a few others are enjoying a good business.
Believe me, I´m the kind of guy that does a ton of research before buying something and I would completely slam any firm that screws me. That said, I´m an owner of a 35mw Executive from Wicked and am quite satisfied with it (although it is a bit pricey). And just today I received a nice laser from Atlas Nova. Both perform well so far. If there was something wrong with either of these units, I would certainly expect these firms to replace them. If they didn´t, I´d be pretty pissed and let them know about it in no uncertain terms.
With respect to the Herc case, I doubt they´re shipping Herc cases for the cost of shipment to those who didn´t purchase a Herc. In other words, the cost of the case is basically built into the price of the Herc if you bought one. And there´s nothing wrong with that since the whole idea is to feel good about what you bought and to feel that you got something of value for the money. They´re smart. In the future, my next laser is likely to be a Laser Glow Aries. Why? Because they do what is right.
My view is that we, as consumers, should get what we pay for. Simple.