Recent content by Soiguapo

Understandable, my first estimate was wrong too. :p I know, the point I was trying to make is it is really easy to effect the readings of a gravitational meter. Well, acceleration measured varies from place to place and effects gravitation readings. It is effected by elevation, density of...

Are you even reading my posts? That part of the math I am certian of. The part I am uncertain of is the relationship between volume and gravity assuming a constant density. I just assumed that the following ratio would be good enough. g'/g = v'/v I know for small changes, this ratio will be...

I am pretty sure I am using the right formula. gravity is measured in m/s^2, that is acceleration. G*m/(r^2) measures the amount of acceleration the mass of 'm' has on any arbitrary object at distance 'r'. That is the correct formula, since the mass of the sensor is irrelevant. A gravity sensor...

This one? G * m / (d ^2) ^2 means squared

Since we don't know the weight of the sensor we can't calculate Newtons, that's why I calculated the acceleration on the sensor instead m1 = mass of the sensor m1a = F = G * m1 * m2 / (r ^ 2) a = F / m1 = G * m2 / (r ^2) So the numbers using a change in radius instead of circumference gives a...

I reworked the numbers, we both were wrong. Let me show my work this time. Earths Radius r=6371000 m Change in circumference dc = 0.025 m Change in radius dr = dc / (2 * pi) = 0.00397 m Earths volume v = 4/3 * pi * r^3 = 1.0827094964226x10^21 m^3 Volume a year from now v' = 4/3 * pi *...

I guess I misunderstood the original question. Mid ocean ridges still apply to the expanding earth, the new ocean crust forms in the center of the ocean as the earth expands meaning the newer stuff is in the middle of the ocean. I don't see the problem here. The little bit about japan breaking...

I was going to say the same thing, this will be my last post. While I am very passionate about this subject, if we continue this discussion we will be just talking past each other and not get anywhere. I really do appreciate the discussion though. I did enjoy, I hope I haven't left you with a...

I know the history of the two theories. I will look into some of the evidences more. So far I have seen GPS measurements, mapping of subduction zones, and isotopes from volcanos. Do you have anything else to add to the list? I actually do appreciate the scrutiny. I want to refine my ideas and...

I'm not a particle physicist. I will keep an eye out for anything though. There is a lot in particles physics we have yet to learn. It not hard to imagine some form of quark/muon/neutrino/ect... reactions occuring that we have yet to discover. The trans-Pacific zipper effect I do. Believe...

I don't think it is coming out of nowhere. I think there is a an explanation coincides perfectly with science. We know about neutrinos. Trillions of them are passing through you every second. These particles also have mass. I think other particles exist that pass through earth and have mass, we...

Let me present some evidence for an expanding earth. This video summarizes most of it up. To recap the video, the ocean plate in the pacific is less than 200 million years old. Age of the Ocean Coastlines in the pacific match up. The most obvious one is Australia and South America. They fit...