ooh WAIT
i found one.
the PGL-III-A-405
but how the dick do you buy one since the page leads you to a pdf file...
it has lower output, probably costs 3x the price of the S1 and looks like a tool. which I assume is made to be used by "tools" such as yourself who promote their products on...
^^^
i really don't like you. you take everything literally and are basically a dick to everyone on this forum.
I never implied that the SONAR II is a toy or looks like a toy.
I just don't see any use for it outside of the fuckingaround spectrum of the plausable uses for a laser of such high...
It was in fact released in the past week despite sharing the host of its bigger brother SOnar II which costs roughly 2 grand.
the 200mW Sonar Lunar is quite an achievement for the price. beautiful hosts which resembles a $2000 toy, with a visible purple beam.
to some.. well most ppl on this...
this is the same with the Spyder III pro aka S3 Spyder Fusion series.
the 100mw Green Spyder with the beam diameter of 1.5mm costs $199.99 as opposed to the 500mw green Spyder with beam diameter of 4mm which runs at $999.99
the price difference is largely due-to the beam diameter...
Yes, the Sonar Burner remained 2k. the Sonar S1 is a new laser entirely. much like the Spyder Arctic, which used the Spyder name/host.
since the release of the Sonar they had two variants. one was two thousand dollars that remained unchanged, and the one with the smaller beam diameter called...
^^ blu-ray lasers are in fact purple.
and yes I suppose they did rebranded.
the only significant difference between the two is the Beam Diameter which is quite significant.
the Extreme aka Sonar is 1 mm. the $2000 Burner is 2.5mm, hence the 2k pricetag.
seems like some of you are missing some key information.
the Sonar Blu-ray laser comes in two variants.
Sonar Extreme
Wavelength: 405nm
Output Power: 300 - 400mW
Beam Diameter: 1mm @ aperture
NOHD* 133 meters
Req Eyewear OD: 2.6
Power Consumption: 280mA
Power supply...